Knowledge and Skills Statement
Distribuya un texto informativo al grupo. Los estudiantes leen en silencio el texto. Presente una idea central que es errónea y pida que los estudiantes, en lluvia de ideas, corroboren si corresponde al texto que previamente leyeron. Presente una segunda idea central que está incompleta y pida igualmente a la clase que la analice. Por último, pida a los estudiantes que en equipos identifiquen cuál es la idea central y que la compartan, tomando turnos, con todo el grupo. Permita que los equipos intercambien sus ideas y observe sus intervenciones.
Further Explanation
Los estudiantes deben identificar la idea central de un texto y respaldarla con evidencia textual. Los estudiantes comprenden que en los textos informativos la idea central es clave para mantener el enfoque y la coherencia del texto.
Research
1. Dickson, R. (2004). Developing "real world intelligence": Teaching argumentative writing through debate. The English Journal, 94(1), 34–40. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/4128845?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Summary: Students who debate are required to consistently engage in critical thinking, argumentation, and presentation. Dickson suggest that debate can be used as a framework to improve writing. Combining debate and essay writing is one way to integrate the two concepts.
2. Denton, C.A., Enos, M., York, M.J., Francis, D. J., Barnes, A.M., Kulesz, P.A., Fletcher, J.M., & Carter, S. (2015). Text-processing differences in adolescent adequate and poor comprehends reading accessible and challenging narrative and informational text. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 393–416. Retrieved from https://ila.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/rrq.105
Summary: This study examined what students consciously determined would help them to access an informational or narrative text. Students used a think-aloud verbal protocol to guide the process. Groups were assigned different genres and different reading levels. Both groups varied along the lines of inference and paraphrasing and monitoring. The study suggests that increasing students' ability in these two areas will improve students' reading ability and comprehension.
3. Scott, J.L. (2012, April). Teaching students to analyze informational text. University of MO-Columbia. Retrieved from https://dese.mo.gov/college-career-readiness/curriculum/model-curriculum/units/courage-and-bravery
Summary: This document provides an overview of the five styles of informational text and characteristics of each. Multiple strategies are embedded in the article that teachers may find useful in teaching students how to analyze informational text. The process outlined in the article is sequential. Charts and visuals are provided.
4. Hedin, L.R., & Conderman, G. (2010). Teaching students to comprehend information text through rereading. The Reading Teacher, 63(7), 556–565. doi:10.1598/RT.63.7.3
Summary: Hedin and Conderman describe specific strategies that students can use to make meaning of the text and increase reading and writing comprehension. The study reveals strategies are successful with struggling readers. The approach uses paraphrasing and rereading to identify the placement of the main ideas, key terms and definitions. The approach also includes pronouns, appositives, or text enhancements. Charts, samples, and references are included.
5. Montelongo, J., Herter, R. J., Ansaldo, R., & Hatter, N. (2010). A lesson cycle for teaching expository reading and writing: this lesson cycle for expository texts uses direct instruction for teaching students to recognize cue words for text structures. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(8), 656+. doi:10.1598/JAAL.53.8.4
Summary: The authors present activities that teachers can use to provide middle school students with practice reading and writing expository texts. Students were taught to look at text structures to find the main idea, practicing deconstructing and reconstructing paragraphs using graphic organizers. Students learned to recognize signal words that correspond to structures such as cause-and-effect, compare and contrast, and problem and solution paragraphs. The results showed significant improvement in students' ability to locate the main idea.