Measuring Photon Momentum
The quantum of EM radiation we call a photon has properties analogous to those of particles we can see, such as grains of sand. A photon interacts as a unit in collisions or when absorbed, rather than as an extensive wave. Massive quanta, like electrons, also act like macroscopic particles—something we expect, because they are the smallest units of matter. Particles carry momentum as well as energy. Despite photons having no mass, there has long been evidence that EM radiation carries momentum. In fact, Maxwell and others who studied EM waves predicted that they would carry momentum. It is now a well-established fact that photons do have momentum. In fact, photon momentum is suggested by the photoelectric effect, where photons knock electrons out of a substance. Figure 12.17 shows macroscopic evidence of photon momentum.
Figure 12.17 shows a comet with two prominent tails. What most people do not know about the tails is that they always point away from the sun rather than trailing behind the comet. Comet tails are composed of gases and dust evaporated from the body of the comet and ionized gas. The dust particles recoil away from the sun when photons scatter from them. Evidently, photons carry momentum in the direction of their motion, away from the sun, and some of this momentum is transferred to dust particles in collisions. Gas atoms and molecules in the blue tail are most affected by other particles of radiation, such as protons and electrons emanating from the sun, rather than by the momentum of photons.
Connections: Conservation of Momentum
Not only is momentum conserved in all realms of physics, but all types of particles are found to have momentum. We expect particles with mass to have momentum, but now we see that massless particles including photons also carry momentum.
Momentum is conserved in quantum mechanics just as it is in relativity and classical physics. Some of the earliest direct experimental evidence of this came from scattering of X-ray photons by electrons in substances, named Compton scattering after the American physicist, Arthur H. Compton (1892–1962). Around 1923, Compton observed that X-rays scattered from materials had a decreased energy and correctly analyzed this as being due to the scattering of photons from electrons. This phenomenon could be handled as a collision between two particles—a photon and an electron at rest in the material. Energy and momentum are conserved in the collision. (See Figure 12.18) He won a Nobel Prize in 1929 for the discovery of this scattering, now called the Compton effect, because it helped prove that photon momentum is given by
12.22 p=hλ,
where h is Planck’s constant and λ is the photon wavelength. Note that relativistic momentum given as p=γmu is valid only for particles having mass.
We can see that photon momentum is small, since p=h/λ and h is very small. It is for this reason that we do not ordinarily observe photon momentum. Our mirrors do not recoil when light reflects from them, except perhaps in cartoons. Compton saw the effects of photon momentum because he was observing X-rays, which have a small wavelength and a relatively large momentum, interacting with the lightest of particles, the electron.
Example 12.5 Electron and Photon Momentum Compared
(a) Calculate the momentum of a visible photon that has a wavelength of 500 nm. (b) Find the velocity of an electron having the same momentum. (c) What is the energy of the electron, and how does it compare with the energy of the photon?
Strategy
Finding the photon momentum is a straightforward application of its definition: p=hλ. If we find the photon momentum is small, then we can assume that an electron with the same momentum will be nonrelativistic, making it easy to find its velocity and kinetic energy from the classical formulas.
Solution for (a)
Photon momentum is given by the equation
12.23 p=hλ.
Entering the given photon wavelength yields
12.24 p=6.63×10–34J⋅s500×10–9m=1.33×10–27kg⋅m/s.
Solution for (b)
Since this momentum is indeed small, we will use the classical expression p=mv to find the velocity of an electron with this momentum. Solving for v and using the known value for the mass of an electron gives
12.25 v=pm=1.33×10–27kg⋅m/s9.11×10–31kg=1460 m/s≈1,460 m/s.
Solution for (c)
The electron has kinetic energy, which is classically given by
12.26 KEe=12mv2.
Thus,
12.27 KEe=12(9.11×10–3kg)(1,455 m/s)2=9.64×10–25J.
Converting this to eV by multiplying by (1 eV)/(1.602×10–19J) yields
12.28 KEe=6.02×10–6eV.
The photon energy E is
12.29 E=hcλ=1,240 eV⋅nm500 nm=2.48 eV,
which is about five orders of magnitude greater.
Discussion
Photon momentum is indeed small. Even if we have huge numbers of them, the total momentum they carry is small. An electron with the same momentum has a 1,460 m/s velocity, which is clearly nonrelativistic. A more massive particle with the same momentum would have an even smaller velocity. This is borne out by the fact that it takes far less energy to give an electron the same momentum as a photon. But on a quantum-mechanical scale, especially for high-energy photons interacting with small masses, photon momentum is significant. Even on a large scale, photon momentum can have an effect if there are enough of them and if there is nothing to prevent the slow recoil of matter. Comet tails are one example, but there are also proposals to build space sails made of aluminized polyester resin that use huge low-mass mirrors to reflect sunlight. In the vacuum of space, the mirrors would gradually recoil and could actually take spacecraft from place to place in the solar system. (See Figure 12.19.)